摘要 : relying on relevant historical documents and summing up hisown personal recollections, concretely considers and profoundly analyzes thetortuous course of the creation, formation and correction of Qu Qiubai’s ''''Left''''adventuris... 展开 relying on relevant historical documents and summing up hisown personal recollections, concretely considers and profoundly analyzes thetortuous course of the creation, formation and correction of Qu Qiubai’s ''''Left''''adventurism. Li maintains that the ''''Left'''' adventurist errors committed by theProvisional Central Political Bureau headed by Qu Qiubai were not the same asthose of Li Lisan who became proud because of victories and even more sowere not like those of Wang Ming who usurped power but were errors com-mitted in the process of carrying out the general principles of the AugustSeventh (1927) Conference and were primarily questions of understanding. Thebasic reasons why these errors were committed were the low theoretical level,inadequate practical experience, dogmatic tendencies, blind subservience to theComintern and the inability to integrate the universal principles of Marxism-Leninism with the concrete realities of the Chinese revolution. Also, the ''''Left''''mood universally prevalent in the Party at that time combined with a ''''Left''''understanding of events to form the motive force for the development of ad-venturism. The Comintern and its representative, Lominadze, made contribu-tions while helping the Chinese Party to convene the August SeventhConference, end Chen Duxiu’s defeatism and determine the general policiesfor the land revolution and armed resistance to the reactionary rule of theKuomintang, etc. However, they were also the creators and strong proponentsof political adventurism, draconian organizational measures and other impor-tant ''''Left'''' policies. 收起