摘要 : Biological sciences have strived to adopt the conceptual framework of physics and have become increasingly quantitatively priented, aiming to refute the assertion that biology appears unquantifiable, unpredictable, and messy. But ... 展开 Biological sciences have strived to adopt the conceptual framework of physics and have become increasingly quantitatively priented, aiming to refute the assertion that biology appears unquantifiable, unpredictable, and messy. But despite all effort, biology is characterized by a paucity of quantitative statements with universal applications. Nonetheless, many biological disciplines—most notably molecular biology—have experienced an ascendancy over the last 50 years. The underlying core concepts andideas permeate and inform many neighboring disciplines. This surprising success is probably not so much attributable to mathematical and statistical approaches in molecular biology, but rather to the preponderance of qualitative approaches, especially visualization. Visualizations can be afforded by quantitative research, but usually they rely on both, quantitative and qualitative research. I claim the following three features to be responsible for the unceasing zeal for using visualizations: (1) visual representations facilitate reasoning, (2) images can be cognitively processed in a "fast" manner, and (3) abstractions of visual representations prompt conceptual advances. In summary, visualizations have largely contributed to the success of molecularbiology by conveying its concepts to other disciplines, and at the same time, eclipsing mere quantitative approaches. However, visualizations also bear the risk of misinterpretation when traversing neighboring disciplines and even more so when pervadingnonscientific domains. 收起