摘要 : Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor prognosis. The optimal timing and role of early coronary angiography (CAG) in OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation remains unclear. The goal of this study is to com... 展开 Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor prognosis. The optimal timing and role of early coronary angiography (CAG) in OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare an early CAG versus delayed CAG strategy in OHCA patients without ST elevation.Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, in June 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early versus delayed early CAG. A random effects meta-analysis was performed.Results A total of seven RCTs were included, providing a total of 1625 patients: 816 in an early strategy and 807 in a delayed strategy. In terms of outcomes assessed, our meta-analysis revealed a similar rate of all-cause mortality (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.22 [0.99-1.50], P = 0.06, I-2 = 0%), neurological status (pooled OR 0.94 [0.74-1.21], = 0.65, I-2 = 0%), need of renal replacement therapy (pooled OR 1.11 [0.78-1.74], P = 0.47, I-2 = 0%) and major bleeding events (pooled OR 1.51 [0.95-2.40], P = 0.08, I-2 = 69%).Conclusion According to our meta-analysis, in patients who experienced OHCA without ST elevation, early CAG is not associated with reduced mortality or an improved neurological status. 收起