摘要 : Purpose - The study has practical implications for decision-makers in that increasing board competence and expertise through training on environmental issues will promote green policy-making.Design/methodology/approach - This stud... 展开 Purpose - The study has practical implications for decision-makers in that increasing board competence and expertise through training on environmental issues will promote green policy-making.Design/methodology/approach - This study included 655 firm-year observations from companieslisted on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2017 and 2021. Panel data regression analysis is used toinvestigate the hypotheses. Additionally, a robustness test is conducted to validate the consistency of theprimary test results.Findings - The results demonstrate that green theme training from the board of directors, board ofcommissioners and independent commissioners has a positive and significant impact on theimplementation of green innovation at each level of the board. This result is aligned with the robustnesstest performed.Research limitations/implications - This study is restricted by the fact that the only data sourcesused to examine the board's green training are publication reports and other reports that disclose theboard's training activities. Therefore, future research can be done by considering other methods, such assurveys to trace green training followed by the board. Additional research may also examine green themetraining in the corporate governance structure from a different theoretical angle, such as agency theoryand human capital theory.Practical implications - In practice, the study has implications for decision-makers in that increasingboard competence and expertise through training on environmental issues will be able to promote greenpolicy-making.Originality/value - This study concentrates on Indonesia with two-board governance characteristics: theboard of directors and the board of commissioners. Several scholars have examined the board of directors inlight of resource dependence theory. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no research has explained thesupervisory board within the context of two-board governance. In addition, the authors have not foundresearch that analyzes board training activities related to the environment. 收起