摘要 : This article develops a heuristic framework to help analysts navigate an important but under-researched issue: 'policy success for whom?' It identifies different forms of policy success across the policy making, program, political... 展开 This article develops a heuristic framework to help analysts navigate an important but under-researched issue: 'policy success for whom?' It identifies different forms of policy success across the policy making, program, political and temporal realms, to assess how a specific policy can differentially benefit a variety of stakeholders, including governments, lobbyists, not-for-profits, community groups and individuals. The article identifies a three-step process to aid researchers in examining any policy initiative in order to understand the forms and extent of success experienced by any actor/stakeholder. Central to these steps is the examination of plausible assessments and counter assessments to help interrogate issues of 'success for whom.' The article demonstrates a practical application of the framework to a case study focused on the Fixing Houses for Better Health (FHBH) program in Australia-a time-limited Commonwealth government-funded program aimed at improving Indigenous health outcomes by fixing housing. 收起