摘要 : Recent empirical evidence suggests that investors focus more on non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) than on traditional GAAP earnings because non-GAAP earnings are believed to proxy for a firm's ongoing profitabili... 展开 Recent empirical evidence suggests that investors focus more on non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) than on traditional GAAP earnings because non-GAAP earnings are believed to proxy for a firm's ongoing profitability, a measure useful for valuation. Managers determine these non-GAAP earnings by excluding certain items from their GAAP income. However, because these non-GAAP earnings are both unaudited and may be disclosed by a firm to manage investors’ perceptions as opposed to inform, investors must infer the credibility of the disclosure through observable firm attributes. In this study we examine whether firms with stronger credibility attributes (corporate governance, higher-quality auditors, and higher historical information quality) will be perceived as providing more credible non-GAAP exclusions than those with weaker attributes. Our expectation is that the market reaction to non-GAAP earnings exclusions of firms with stronger credibility attributes will be greater than for those with weaker attributes. Our results support our expectation. 收起